ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY 20th DEC 2016

ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY (20 MARKS) – 1 hour and 15 minutes

Read the dialogue below and answer the following questions.

REJAB: We should fight for racial equality. All legal special racial privileges should be abolished once and for all. Only then, there shall be no racial hatred anymore in this world. (B1)

ZAINAB: I don’t agree because there is also another factor that causes racial hatred. The West intentionally creates disunity among us in the East so that they can colonize us. If we make a comparison between the East and the West, the East is far more sincere in humanitarianism than the West. (B2)

REJAB:  Please prove to me that the East is sincere. Otherwise, the East is as insincere as the West! (F1)

ZAINAB: The problem with men is that they always ask women to prove their sincerity by declaring their submission to men’s desire!  (F2)

REJAB: Whatever our disagreement is, I think non-Muslims should be allowed to use the word “Allah” in their religious scriptures to foster at least a multicultural image of Islam as a religion for all.

 PART 1: SHORT ANSWERS (8 MARKS)

Write your answers in the lined-paper given separately.

1.1 What is the barrier present in B1? (1M)

1.2 Why is it not suitable to say that? (1M)

2.1 What is the barrier present in B2? (1M)

2.2 Why is it not suitable to say that? (1M)

3.1 What is the fallacy committed in F1? (1M)

3.2 Why is it not suitable to say that?(1M)

4.1 What is the fallacy committed in F2? (1M)

4.2 Why is it not suitable to say that?(1M)

PART 2: ESSAY (12 MARKS)

What is your opinion on “Non-Muslims should be allowed to use the word “Allah” in their religious scriptures to foster at least a multicultural image of Islam as a religion for all.”?

Write TWO (2) arguments in the lined-paper. The essay should NOT EXCEED 300 WORDS.

ANSWER SCHEME A. ESSAY

1.1 Stereotyping (1M)
1.2 Student explains how what Brock said showed that he is affected by a barrier (i.e. hinders from thinking about something else)
E.g. Brock has judged a Pokemon Go! player using his judgement about Pokemon Go! players in general without considering that that player could be different from the group. (1M)
Note: Simply explaining the meaning of the barrier does not answer the question fully.

2.1 Self-interested thinking (1M)
2.2 Student explains how what Misty said showed that she is affected by a barrier (i.e. hinders from thinking about something else)
E.g. Misty defended the position of the players because she is one of them without considering the possible truth in the opinion against Pokemon Go! players. (1M)
Note: Simply explaining the meaning of the barrier does not answer the question fully.

3.1 Begging the question (1M)
3.2 Student explains how Brock’s premise is irrelevant to support his conclusion in the form of the said fallacy.
E.g. Brock tried to prove that Pokemon Go! is dangerous to non-players by repeating it with different wordings as “unsafe situation” which is irrelevant. (1M)
Note: Simply defining the fallacy does not answer the question fully.

4.1 Red Herring (1M)
4.2 Student explains how Misty’s premise is irrelevant to support her conclusion in the form of the said fallacy.
E.g. Misty tried to prove that Pokemon Go! is not dangerous by raising an irrelevant issue of it being exciting, in which she thinks has rejected what Brock said. (1M)
Note: Simply defining the fallacy does not answer the question fully.

*For the essay, rubrics are the same as presented in Assessment plan.

ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY (20 MARKS) – 1 hour and 15 minutes

Read the dialogue below and answer the following questions.

Brock: Pokemon Go! players are insensitive and pose a danger to the people around them. Look at that guy, he’s trying to catch a Pokemon, I bet he will cause trouble to the people around. (B1)

Misty: I am a player myself and I think that it is not fair to simply label us as trouble makers. We should be viewed as enthusiastic people exploring the world! (B2)

Brock: It is dangerous to non-players as people who do not play it will in an unsafe situation. (F1)

Misty: I’ll tell you again, it’s not dangerous because it is an exciting game which requires you to explore many places that you have not even considered going. (F2)

Brock: What if I say, only people who are above 18 years old are allowed to play Pokemon Go!?

PART 1: SHORT ANSWERS (8 MARKS)
Write your answers in the lined-paper given separately.
1.1 What is the barrier present in B1? (1M)
1.2 Why is it not suitable to say that? (1M)

2.1 What is the barrier present in B2? (1M)
2.2 Why is it not suitable to say that? (1M)

3.1 What is the fallacycommitted in F1? (1M)
3.2 Why is it not suitable to say that?(1M)

4.1 What is the fallacycommitted in F2? (1M)
4.2 Why is it not suitable to say that?(1M)

PART 2: ESSAY (12 MARKS)
What is your opinion on “Only people above 18 years old are allowed to play Pokemon Go!”? Write TWO (2) arguments in the lined-paper. The essay should NOT EXCEED 300 WORDS.

exercise mid term

Have many books do you read in every month? What kind of books? 

QUESTION 1: How do you apply the three stages of Tafakkur on ‘BOOK’?

Stage 1: ____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
(1 MARK)
Stage 2: ____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
(1 MARK)
Stage 3: ____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
(1 MARK)






Rejab: Whenever I try to read a book, it ends up the book reads me! I find reading boring, hence I can fall into snoring easily! Anyway to help me?

QUESTION 2: How do you apply critical and creative thinking to help Rejab?

You:
Critical thinking (2 questions to get more information):
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
(1 MARK)
Creative thinking (2 specific non-typical solutions):
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
(2 MARKS)

REJAB: Thank you for your suggestions. What will others think about your first suggestion?

QUESTION 3: Do a PMI on your first suggestion. (Drawing a mind-map is allowed, as long as points are understandable phrases) (2 MARKS)

You: ____________________________________________________

REJAB: Hmm… interesting. How about your second suggestion? How do we improve that?

QUESTION 4: Apply the REVERSION technique to improve your second suggestion.(2 reversions)(2 MARKS)

You: ______________________________

 

REJAB: Thanks!However, I think we should listen to gurus more than reading books about Islam because we should have a teacher to guide us. If we learn Islam without a teacher, we are learning from the devil!


QUESTION 5: Do you agree with the underlined statement? Write TWO (2) arguments. The arguments should not exceed 300 words.

PROJECT NOV-DEC 2016

TITLE OF SOLUTION: ISLAM: A TRUE RELIGION FOR ALL

OBJECTIVE: To increase awareness of Islam among muslims and non-Muslim Chinese as a rahmah lil-aalamiin by comparing with Buddhism and Christianity.

METHOD: Online campaign

PROCEDURE:

1) Create a FB group

2) Create two youtube videos with every malay student speaking in Mandarin. One group shall  be comparing Islam with Buddhism. Another group shall be comparing Islam with Christianity. Subtitles in Malay and English shall be made.

3) Marketing the two videos through social media. Number of views and comments in social media are indicators of the degree of awareness.

4) Due to the limitation of time (short sem), two groups shall be helping each other to work out these procedures as only one FB group is allowed. The two videos shall be viralled separately.

BILA GRADUAN WANITA LEBIH GRADUAN LELAKI

fs = female student
ms = male student



CFS YEAR  (10 fs: 9 ms)
Imagine every ms couples with ONE fs but only Rejab refuses to couple with anyone. How many fs are available for Rejab?

ANSWER:  2 fs for Rejab



IIUM MAIN CAMP 1st year (NEW INTAKE  10 fs: 9 ms)
Imagine every NEW ms couples with ONE NEW fs.  How many fs are available for Rejab overall?

ANSWER: 3 fs for Rejab


IIUM MAIN CAMP 2nd year (NEW INTAKE  10 fs: 9 ms)
Imagine every NEW ms couples with ONE NEW fs.  How many fs are available for Rejab overall?

ANSWER: 4 fs for Rejab


IIUM MAIN CAMP 3rd year (NEW INTAKE  10 fs: 9 ms)
Imagine every NEW ms couples with ONE NEW fs.  How many fs are available for Rejab overall?

ANSWER:5 fs for Rejab


IIUM MAIN CAMP 4th year (NEW INTAKE  10 fs: 9 ms)
Imagine every NEW ms couples with ONE NEW fs.  How many fs are available for Rejab overall?

ANSWER: 6 fs for Rejab


OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
a) culturally, a graduate woman will not marry a non-graduate man if male graduates are available for her.
b) culturally, man will not marry a woman older than him if younger girls are available for him.

EXERCISE 1 FOR ALL TOOLS

1) MUN SIEW YEE became a Muslim. A muslim friend told him to choose an Islamic name by changing his name to Hamid Chong Bin Abdullah. SIEW YEE asks your opinion. Use the following thinking tools to help SIEW YEE.

THINKER’S KEY: reverse method
STANDARDS: precision / accuracy / fairness / consistency
FIQH AWLAWIYAT / MAQASID: ________
CORT: OPV/ PMI
BARRIERS: sociocentrism




2) Rejab: Entrance into university must be merit based, not gender based. 

Evaluate this statement based on these thinking tools:

STANDARDS: completeness
THINKER’S KEY: what if / combination
CORT: C&S/PMI
FIQH AWLAWIYAT/MAQASID: _______

BONO CORT 1

BONO CORT 1

PMI   =  PLUS, MINUS, INTERESTING

CAF  = CONSIDER ALL FACTORS

OPV  = OTHER PEOPLE’S VIEWS

C&S  =  CONSEQUENCES AND SEQUELS

AGO =  AIMS, GOALS, OBJECTIVES

APC  = ALTERNATIVES, POSSIBILITIES, CHOICES

FIP    = FIRST IMPORTANT PRIORITIES

SHOULD I ORGANIZE A "TOUCH A DOG" CAMPAIGN?

do PMI

a)why do you like  b)why don’t you like   c)what does it tell you about the culture

a)open people’s minds

b)many will attack me

c)malaysian muslims are ultra sensitive with dog issue but ok with artists’ overlimits

do CAF = Have I considered how to minimize provocation?

do OPV = Have I considered the views of mufti selangor and mufti perlis where both of them have disagreements? Have I considered the views of politicians? Views of marketing gurus? Views of journalists? Views of Mazhab Shafi’e and other mazhabs?

do FIP = Have I considered the maqasid / fiqh awlawiyat?

do C&S = Have I considered short-term (1-2 years), medium term (3-5 years), long term (over 5 years) consequences?

do AGO = I have asked for financial helps to buy dogs and rent a venue in order to organize a touch a dog campaign

 AIM (what the OBJECTIVES need to achieve) = organize touch a dog campaign

GOAL (ultimate/final destination) = open people’s minds

OBJECTIVES (recognisable points of achievement along the way) = ask for financial helps, buy dogs, rent a venue

do APC = Have I considered changing the name of the campaign?

THINKER’S KEYS

1) The REVERSE method
We are always directed to one way thinking, one direction. 
e.g. America is a civilized country.
God exists.

We REVERSE this direction by thinking:
America is NOT a civilized country.
God does NOT exist!


2) The WHAT IF method
We prefer to think in a comfort zone.
e.g. I am a bumiputra in Malaysia. Therefore, I have special privileges.

We ask WHAT IF: WHAT IF ….special privileges shall be taken away after 10 years from now?

3) The DISADVANTAGES method
We always highlight the defects of a thing but do not seek to make improvements.
e.g. We should discourage the culture of polygamy.


We list the disadvantages AND the improvements

disadvantages:  a) men are incapable of fairness
b) male income is insufficient
c) women feel hard to accept

improvements:  a) change the educational system to emphasize on development of quality men
b) increase the number of male student in universities
c) ban movies, cartoons like cinderalla, snow white which emphasis one man-one woman love stories. Rather create cartoons, movies that praise one man-many women love stories.


4)The COMBINATION (qiyas/analogy) method
When we have a problem, we focus only on the specific problem.
e.g. divorce rates have reached an extremely high level.

COMBINE the issue of the growing divorce rates with the issue of the growing number of graduates to find out more why divorce rates have increased so much.

why divorce rates grow: a) couples are too busy working, hence breakdown of communication
b) couples rush into marriage

why the number of graduates grow: a) online open universities make learning far more flexible.
b)  overflow of graduate candidates in the market. A degree becomes a necessity of basic survival nowadays.

When we have combined and make comparison between these 2 issues, we discover new reasons for the rise of divorce rates:

A) too many ONLINE affairs. Affairs become more FLEXIBLE!
B) the MARKET has OVERFLOW of female CANDIDATES. Early marriage becomes a NECESSITY nowadays.



5) The B A R method
B = B-igger
A = A - dd
R = R - eplace


Sometimes we are stuck in creativity.
e.g. storage in my car is small.

Bigger = throw away back seats to make storage BIGGER.
Add = ADD something on the roof of the car to increase storage space
Replace = REPLACE  handles with hangers

FALLACIES: ANSWER TO LATIHANN 1

ANSWER
1) Conclusion: There are many Gods
Premise: there are many races
Assumption: One God can only create One Race.
Fallacy: Questionable Cause: Multiple Races must be CAUSED by many Gods.



2) Conclusion: Religions and prophets are man-made.
Premise: All humans want to control other humans.
Assumption: All humans have insincere ambitions
Fallacy: Personal Attack: Accusing Prophets as having insincere ambitions


3) Conclusion: Religions are not divine
Premise: Religions are man-made
Assumption: Divine knowledge is impossible.
Fallacy: Begging the Question: Being not divine implies being man-made.



4) Conclusion: Unlike other religions, only Islam teach some bad things, e.g. terrorism.
Premise: Many Muslims kill innocent people. e.g. ISIS
Assumption: Muslims represent Islam
Fallacy: Red Herring: the main topic is about the RELIGION of Islam, but diverted to BELIEVERS of Islam (muslims).


5) Conclusion:  non-argument (conditional clause)
Premise: non-argument (conditional clause)
Assumption: The answer can be based on HUMAN judgement which is EITHER "certainly" heaven OR "certainly" hell 
Fallacy: False Alternative




6)Conclusion: Haram to touch a dog
Premise: ustaz at religious department said so.
Assumption: What ever any ustaz at religious department teach about Islam MUST be accurate.
Fallacy: Inappropriate Appeal To Authority



7)Conclusion: Religion intoxicates you.
Premise: Religion is an opium
Assumption: Religion does not motivate a person to deal with real life issues.
Fallacy: Weak Analogy



8)Conclusion: Dogs are najis.
Premise: No hadith that states that dogs are NOT najis.
Assumption: Dogs are BY DEFAULT najis. Any argument against this must supply evidence. I don't have to supply evidence why dogs are BY DEFAULT najis.
Fallacy: Appeal to ignorance

FALLACIES: LATIHAN 1

9. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE
9.1. Personal Attack
9.2. Look Who’s Talking
9.3. Two Wrongs Make a Right
9.4. Red Herring
9.5. Begging the Question




10. FALLACIES OF INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
10.1. Inappropriate Appeal to Authority
10.2. Appeal to Ignorance
10.3. False Alternative
10.4. Questionable Cause
10.5. Weak Analogy




1)  Rejab: There are many Gods since there are many races.


Conclusion:
Premise:
Assumption:
Fallacy:



2) Awang: Humans desire to control other humans. They want other humans to submit to them. Hence, they create religions and claim to be prophets.



3) Chee Kuan: Religions are man-made.
Lady Gaga: Why?
Chee Kuan: Because it is not divine.



4) Wan Kim Ling: All religions teach goodness except Islam. Islam also teach bad things like terrorism. Many Muslims love to kill innocent people. For example, ISIS.


5) Goh Pei Hoon: I am a Christian. Do you believe that if I die, I shall CERTAINLY go to heaven or hell?


6) Wong Poh Chee: I don't want to become a Muslim in view of the fact that Islam does not allow me to touch my beloved puppy called Lucky.

Shafie: Who told you this?

Wong Poh Chee: One Malay Ustaz teaching muallafs at the Islamic department.




7) Low Eng Huat: Religion is an opium. This is why it intoxicates you and makes you forget about real issues in life.


8) Wahab: Since you believe that dog is not najis, then supply a hadith where the Prophet said explicitly that dogs are NOT najis!

SURAH AT-TAKAATSUR (MA JIAN)

3)  真的 ,你們將來就知道了。

4) 真的 ,你們將來就知道了。

5) 真的 ,假若你們有真知灼見 ,(你們必不疏忽) ,

6) 你們必定看見火獄 ,

7) 然後 ,你們必親眼看見它。

8) 在那日 ,你們必為恩澤而被審問。

ASSSESSMENT PROJECT 30%

TERJEMAHAN SURAH AL-FATIHAH DALAM BAHASA MELAYU

link:
http://www.surah.my/1




Dengan nama Allah, Yang Maha Pemurah, lagi Maha Mengasihani

Segala puji tertentu bagi Allah, Tuhan yang Memelihara dan Mentadbirkan sekalian alam

Yang Maha Pemurah, lagi Maha Mengasihani

Yang Menguasai pemerintahan hari Pembalasan (hari akhirat)

Engkaulah sahaja (Ya Allah) Yang Kami sembah dan kepada Engkaulah sahaja kami memohon pertolongan.

Tunjukilah kami jalan yang lurus.

Iaitu jalan orang-orang yang Engkau telah kurniakan nikmat kepada mereka, bukan (jalan) orang-orang yang Engkau telah murkai dan bukan pula (jalan) orang-orang yang sesat.

FALLACIES

FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE

FALLACIES: ERRORS IN REASONING

1) Personal Attack

Zainab: Dog is najis but we can still touch it as we touch our 

najis.

Rejab: Haram to touch a dog. You are not an ustaz. You must 

always listen to what an ustaz says.

2)Look Who’s Talking (cakap tak serupa bikin)

Rejab : Why do you backbite me?

Zainab: Why do you yourself backbite me that I backbite you!

3) Two Wrongs Make a Right

Rejab : Why don't you comb your hair when you come to class?

Awang: Why don't you iron your shirt when you come to class?

4) Red Herring

Zainab: Are you married?

Rejab: You will never want to marry me because I am not a 

sweet talker. No one really loves and respects me. Don't ask such

 a question to break my heart.

5) Begging the Question

Zainab: Why have you failed in your exam?

Rejab: Because I have not passed it.

FALLACIES OF INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE

1) Inappropriate Appeal to Authority

Einsten says that this hadith is authentic.


2) Appeal to Ignorance

Bring four witnesses to prove that you have not committed zina.


3) False Alternative

Choose either you are my enemy or my lover.


4) Questionable Cause

The reason why you failed in your marriage is because you did not get blessings from your parents.



5) Weak Analogy

Pigs are like dogs. Both are haram to be eaten.

BARRIERS TO CRITICAL THINKING

1) Egocentrism (SIT & SSB)

a) self-interested thinking
A football player says, "It is a human right to pay higher salary to football players, rather than badminton players."


b) self- serving bias
A professor says, "I must be more intelligent than non-professors!" 


2) Sociocentrism(GB & Conformism)
a) Group Bias
Arabs are always more religious than  other races because Arabic is their mother tongue.

b)Conformism
Smoking is good because all my friends smoke!


3) Stereotyping
Since IIUM is an ISLAMIC university, all IIUM students listen to nasyeeds only and they have no gf and bf. Haram!


4) Wishful Thinking
A man, "I wish I became pregnant." 
A woman, "I hope I become pregnant."


5)Scapegoating
An unfaithful husband says to his wife, "Darling, all my extramarital affairs are not my fault. The iblis forced me to do it! If iblis did not exist, I would remain faithful to you forever."

MAQASID SHARIAH AND FIQH AWLAWIYAT

6 MAQASID  SHARI'AH   (مقاصد الشريعة)

(OBJECTIVES OF THE SHARI'AH)

1) SUSTAINING THE RELIGION  
حفظ الدين


2) SUSTAINING THE SELF/LIFE
حفظ النفس/ الحياة


3) SUSTAINING THE MIND/EDUCATION
حفظ العقل


4) SUSTAINING WEALTH/ECONOMY
حفظ المال


5) SUSTAINING LINEAGE/FAMILY
حفظ النسب


6) SUSTAINING DIGNITY/SELF ESTEEM
حفظ العرض



ISSUES
a) Why backbiting is haram?
b) Why corruption is haram?
c) Why homosexuality is haram?
d)  Why insulting other religions is haram?
e) Why plagiarism is haram?
f) Why environmental pollution is haram?






FIQH AWLAWIYAT  (فقه الأولاويات)

1) tolerate minor harm in order to gain major benefit

2) tolerate minor harm in order to avoid major harm

3) give up minor benefit in order to gain major benefit

4) give up minor benefit in order to avoid major harm



ISSUES
a) Should I sacrifice my life to save my family?

b) Should I keep my savings rather than invest in my education?

c) Should I go watch a movie and leave my injured dog to die?

d) Should I lie because if I don't do so, my marriage shall be torn apart!

STANDARDS OF CRITICAL THINKING

1) CLARITY

Islam is a weltanschauung. This is why it is true.


2) PRECISION - 3) ACCURACY

a)Malaysia achieved independence on August.

b)Malaysia achieved independence on August 1957.

c)Malaysia achieved independence on 31st August 1957.

d)Malaysia achieved idependence on 31st August 1960.


d is inaccurate.
a,b,c are all accurate but c is most precise.


4) RELEVANCE

Our university is a great university in view of the fact that its lecturers are all so charming!


5) CONSISTENCY

John is a Christian who does not believe in the existence of Jesus,


6) COMPLETENESS/SUFFICIENCY-- NECESSARY

The only condition to become a Muslim is that you believe in God.

(It is a necessary condition to believe in God but it alone is not sufficient to become a Muslim)


7) FAIRNESS

Men are always more capable of thinking rationally than women. I am so blessed to be born a man!

TS 4: ARGUMENTS

ARGUMENTS = PREMISE + CONCLUSION

1) WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT? 

A) Chee Kuan is a good muslim.

B) Chee Kuan is a good muslim because he observes his solat.

(A) is not an ARGUMENT because it does not tell you WHY Chee Kuan is good Muslim. 

(B) is an ARGUMENT because it tells you WHY (PREMISE) and state the CONCLUSION.

Conclusion: Chee Kuan is a good muslim.

Premise: He observes his solat.

2) HOW DO YOU IDENTIFY CONCLUSION & PREMISE?

A)by detecting the indicators: premise indicator or conclusion indicator. Notice that the conclusion is in red colour and premise in blue below:

i) Chee Kuan is a good muslim because he observes his solat.

ii) Chee Kuan observes his solat, therefore he is a good muslim.

because = premise indicator

therefore = conclusion indicator

B) by understanding the context.

Chee Kuan is a good muslim. He observes his solat. No one can claim that he is a good Muslim if he ignores his compulsory solats.

3) IS THIS A FACT OR AN OPINION?

a) Islam says that it is haram to touch a dog.

b) Malay culture says that it is haram to touch a dog.

4) ARE THESE ARGUMENTS OR NON-ARGUMENTS?

a) Yesterday, I saw a football match. It was a match between Selangor and Kedah. Kedah won thru penalties. (report)

b) You should not wear black shirts. You should wear white instead. (assertion)

c) I love fruits such as durian, apple, bananas. (illustration)

d)  If it rains, I go to sleep! (conditional sentences)

e) i) I did not attend yesterday's class because I was ill. (explanation)

ii) I did not attend yesterday's class because it is a human right to attend or not. (argument)

MY SCHEDULE

HSA0344 G306 THINKING SKILLS

MON 2 - 4 PM ANNEX BUILDING (AX201)

TUE        9 - 11 AM ANNEX BUILDING (AX201)

WED 11 - 1 AM ANNEX BUILDING (AX201)

THUR 2 - 4 PM ANNEX BUILDING (AX201)

DAKWAH TRAINING-PAHANG WITH XIFU

SOALAN 1

Apakah fitnah terhadap  umat dunia yang PALING besar?

RESPONS PESERTA: 

1) Aizudin: Harta
2) Arif: Kesenangan
3) Ismail: Fitnah Dajjal
4) Yussuf: Terlindung dari kebenaran ajaran Islam
5) Azrul: tipudaya
6) Azim: media sosial
7) Zuraidi: jahil
8) najib: harta
9) nasrul: pangkat
10) hairul: wanita
11) Majeed: Freemasonry



SOALAN 2

Senario A
Rejab cari duit haram sebagai  wasilah untuk capai objektif iaitu berzina dgn wanita idamannya.


duit: "fitnah wasilah"
wanita: "fitnah objektif"



Senario B
Awang guna pistol utk rompak duit demi utk dptkan wanita idamannya.

Duit adalah objektif bagi wasilah-pistol tetapi duit juga adalah wasilah bagi mencapai objektif-wanita.

pistol: fitnah wasilah
duit: fitnah objektif/wasilah
wanita: fitnah objektif


Susun kesemua 11 fitnah di atas kpd dua kategori yg mungkin overlap: 

a) fitnah wasilah
b) fitnah objektif



RESPONS PESERTA
Arif: 2,4,7 = fitnah objektif 


SOALAN 3

Adakah media sosial itu fitnah wasilah atau fitnah objektif atau dua2 sekali? Cuba lakarkan SENARIO (spt dua contoh di atas tentang Rejab dan Awang) utk menjelaskan respons.


RESPONS PESERTA
Bedhead: 
Justin guna sosial media utk aibkan Oliver. Sosial media adalah fitnah wasilah di sini dan aibkan itu adalah objektif.

Tp kalau Justin belajar programming utk cipta social media yg baru, sosial media adalah objektif dan programming adalah wasilah.


SOALAN 4

JIKA SOCIAL MEDIA BLH JADI WASILAH/OBJEKTIF,  BAGAIMANA DGN KANUN HUDUD?

RESPONS

Arif: Kanun Hudud adalah wasilah.


SOALAN 5
Social media sebagai WASILAH  blh jadi FITNAH atau blh juga jadi MANFAAT.

Adakah kanun Hudud sebagai WASILAH blh jadi FITNAH atau blh juga jadi MANFAAT?


RESPONS
Majed: kanun hudud mungkin sebagai wasilah boleh fitnah bila ia dipergunakan oleh parti2 politik


SOALAN 6

Kita nilai balik respons2 kpd SOALAN 1:


Fitnah2 Paling Besar Terhadap Umat Dunia:

1) Aizudin: Harta
2) Arif: Kesenangan
3) Ismail: Fitnah Dajjal
4) Yussuf: Terlindung dari kebenaran ajaran Islam
5) Azrul: tipudaya
6) Azim: media sosial
7) Zuraidi: jahil
8) najib: harta
9) nasrul: pangkat
10) hairul: wanita
11) Majeed: Freemasonry


Apakah fitnah yang tidak di sebut dlm list atas ini? KANUN HUDUD tidak di sebut walaupun ada kemungkinan menjadi fitnah. 

Cuba amalkan teknik THINK OF THE UNTHINKABLE or UNSANGKARABLE iaitu: fikir dalam, membaca apa yang tidak di tulis, melihat apa yang tidak dizahirkan, READ BETWEEN THE LINES, uncover the unconscious matrix.

Mindset kita di control oleh MATRIX. Kita rasa kita bebas berfikir tetapi sebenarnya kita bebas hanya WITHIN a MATRIX. Latihan dakwah ini ialah usaha untuk kuar dari MATRIX. 

Contohnya saya telah bawa semua step by step sehingga step 5 dimana akhirnya Kanun Hudud mungkin menjadi fitnah. Sebelum ini, kanun Hudud tiada dalam list fitnah. Sekarang sudah di exposekan. Selepas kita identify apa yang tidak di zahirkan, sekarang cuba tanya 

SOALAN KE 6: MENGAPA KANUN HUDUD TIDAK DISEBUT DLM LIST FITNAH DI ATAS?


Soalan ini ptg untuk mengenali dengan lebih dekat MATRIX yang control mindset kita. Cuba brainstorm dgn beberapa respons yang berbeza. KHILAF ITU RAHMAT.


RESPONS PESERTA


HJ ZURAIDI: Apa definasi fitnah?

DEFINASI FITNAH
Sesuatu yg meletakkan seseorang dlm cabaran,ujian yg expose dia kemungkinan BESAR kpd mudarat, bahaya. E.g. ulama kata zaman dajjal adalah fitnah maksudnya zaman dajjal meletakkan seseorang kpd cabaran yg expose dia kemungkinan besar kpd mudarat.

JANNAH‬: Sebab kita sebagai orang Islam tak melihat hudud sebagai fitnah. Selalu nampak hudud ni mcm isu yang mmg default dlm Islam. Tapi kita lupa nak melihat ia dari sudut pandang masyarakat secara umum.

SITI MUNIRAH: Sbb kita sbgai org yg faham tidak cakna dgn majoriti masyarakat yg tidak faham.Mungkin disebabkan kurangnya pergaulan (senbang dan berbincang) dgn masyarakat umum.

NASRUL: Sebab masih ramai individu bukan beragama Islam yang memandangkan bahawa sesebuah negara itu berhak mengubal peraturannya sendiri. Jadi jika Kanun Hudud dilaksanakan, ia tidak akan menjadi fitnah yang besar.

MAJED: Polygamy. tidak deisenaraikan sebab perkara itu halal/sunnah/berfaedah.

BEDHEAAAD: 1. Kenapa lelaki bukan fitnah paling besar ? kenapa perempuan ? apa salah perempuan ? dajjal lelaki kan !!

2. Kenapa bukan parti politik dan parti islam like ISIS atau SYIAH IRAN ? kenapa freemason? 

3. Kenapa media sosial tapi bukan university dan  pondok atau madrasah atau tahfiz  ??

4. Kenapa harta ? kenapa bukan pengikut pengikut syeikh seluruh alam ? 

5. Kenapa pangkat tapi bukan mereka yang konservatif atau manusia liberal sekalian alam ?

KENAPAAAAAAAA



SOALAN 7:  Kita sudah list 11 fitnah dan membongkarkan lagi fitnah2 lain yang tidak disebut. Kita sudah bezakan antara fitnah wasilah dan fitnah objektif. FITNAH WASILAH ialah sesuatu yang terkandung dalam soalan MENGAPA PERLU INI.

e.g. Rejab nak cari duit. Mengapa Rejab perlu duit? Kerana nak beli pistol. Kita lontar soalan mengapa perlu ini kpd duit. Ini membuat duit itu menjadi fitnah wasilah. Jawapan kpd mengapa ialah krn nak beli pistol. Pistol adalah fitnah objektif.


Kita juga sudah berhujah bahawa satu  fitnah boleh jadi fitnah objektif dan fitnah wasilah pada masa yang sama. Kita tanya pula MENGAPA REJAB PERLU PISTOL.

Responsnya kerana nak bunuh Awang. Pistol sekarang berubah menjadi fitnah wasilah. Bunuh Awang menjadi fitnah objektif. Sekarang tanya lagi MENGAPA PERLU BUNUH AWANG? Kerana Awang tak bagi Rejab kahwin dengan anak perempuannya.  Sekarang, bunuh Awang pula menjadi fitnah wasilah. Fitnah objektifnya ialah Awang tak bagi kawen dgn anak perempuannya.


Soalan 7 ialah cuba tanya MENGAPA PERLU INI dan respons kpd KENAPA dalam satu rangkaian wasilah-objektif-wasilah-objektif sehingga sampai kepada FITNAH OBJEKTIF YANG PALING TINGGI.

DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN KAEDAH INI, APAKAH FITNAH OBJEKTIF YANG PALING TINGGI?

EPISOD 1: HAYY IBN YAQZAN

EPISOD 1: HAYY BUKAN SEBARANG TARZAN

(MENCABAR MINDA KAMU KALAU MAU BEBAS BERFIKIR)

KISAH ini adalah diilhamkan oleh cerita klasik falsafah Sufi Hayy Ibn Yaqzan yang ditulis oleh Ibn Tufail yang meninggal tahun 1185.

Dia adalah ‘anak haram’ yang dianggap memalukan umat. Ramai yang buang bayi kerana malu dengan perzinaan yang berleluasa, hasil masyarakat yang terlalu pentingkan kebendaan. Kalau nak kahwin, habis belajar dulu. Kalau nak kahwin, kenduri besar wajib ada. Kalau murah, apa kata orang pula. Siapakah yang bersalah? Ibunya yang berzina atau masyarakat yang memaksa?

Tetapi ibunya tidak sanggup buang bayinya ke sampah. Ibunya meletakkannya dalam bakul. Sambil beristighfar dan berdoa kepada ALLAH SWT, ibunya harap sungai akan membawa bakul yang mengandungi bayi ini ke tempat yang selamat.

Ibunya memberi nama bayi ini sebagai Hayy Ibnu Yaqzan. Maksud Hayy ialah Hidup. Ibnu Yaqzan maksudnya Anak Kepada Yang Sedar.

Hiduplah Hayy! Sedarlah dari mimpi masyarakat yang lalai dalam dunia kebendaan.

Walaupun ‘anak haram’ tetapi rahmat ALLAH SWT luas. Doa ibu diperkenankan. Bakul itu pun membawa Hayy ke sebuah pulau yang terpencil. Tiada umat manusia di pulau ini.

Seekor rusa betina jumpa dan memelihara Hayy. Rusa ini memelihara Hayy seperti memelihara bayi-bayinya yang lain. Tiada hak istimewa bagi Hayy. Bila Hayy meningkat dewasa, dia belajar memburu, makan sendiri, belajar cuci najis sendiri dan lain-lain. Kerana tiada hak istimewa, Hayy meningkat dewasa dengan laju sekali, lalu menjadi individu yang gagah, berani dan berdikari.

Rusa ini memelihara Hayy sehingga Hayy mencapai umur 7 tahun. Tiba-tiba Hayy dapati Rusa ini dalam keadaan tidak lagi bergerak. Tidak lagi bersuara. Sebenarnya, ibunya ini sudah mati. Tetapi Hayy tidak faham. Dia cuba membedah tubuh ibunya untuk mencari apa jua yang dapat menghidupkan ibunya kembali.

Dia lihat rusa-rusa dan haiwan-haiwan yang lain juga akan mati dan Hayy tidak dapat mencari switch yang dapat hidupkan kembali yang telah mati. Walaupun tidak berjaya menghidupkan, tetapi ini adalah sumber motivasi kepada Hayy untuk mencari apa makna hidup dan mati.

Apakah aku hidup hanya untuk menanti kematian? Apa makna hidup? Bertahun lamanya Hayy mencari sehingga umur 20 tahun. Hayy tidak membuang masa remajanya. Bahkan Hayy tidak mempunyai konsep ‘remaja’ kerana tiada Pokemon Go, tiada rakan sebaya di pulau yang tiada civil society atau ‘sekolah’ untuk memberitahu, mendidik dan menghukum bahawa dia adalah ‘remaja’.

Hayy hanya mempunyai konsep survival seperti haiwan-haiwan lain. Tetapi yang membezakan Hayy dengan haiwan-haiwan lain ialah Hayy mencari makna kehidupan.

Aku hidup untuk apa? Mengapa aku sahaja yang tanya soalan ini, dan tidak haiwan-haiwan lain? Tiba-tiba Hayy mendapat ilham bahawa hanya beliau di pulau ini yang tanya soalan ini kerana dia ada keistimewaan dalam dirinya yang kita istilahkan sebagai ‘akal’.

Walaupun Hayy tidak mempunyai istilah ‘akal’ seperti kita, tetapi ini bukan sekadar istilah bagi Hayy. Ia adalah kebebasan!

Hayy tanya soalan-soalan yang kritis tentang kehidupan, tentang alam, tentang hakikat, tentang segala-galanya. Beliau tidak konformis. Tiada syeikh, tiada paderi, tiada sami, tiada ulama yang menentukan tahap mana penggunaan akal jatuh haram. Tiada liberalis yang kata penggunaan tak logik. Hayy bebas dalam erti kata yang sebenar.

Bagi kita yang ber"tamadun”, kita fobia guna akal. Takut sesat dan menyesat. Kita matikan akal kita dan minta ulama berfikir untuk kita. Kita tidak mahu berfikir. Kita bertaqlid buta sahaja. Tetapi bagi Hayy, akalnya yang menghidupkannya, membezakannya dengan haiwan-haiwan lain.

Aku hidup, haiwan-haiwan lain pun hidup. Tetapi aku memiliki keistimewaan akal untuk majukan hidupku dengan bertanya sebanyak mungkin persoalan-persoalan walaupun belum ada jawapan. Semakin banyak akalku membangkitkan persoalan walaupun belum ada jawapan, semakin aku rasa diri aku jauh berbeza dari haiwan-haiwan lain, dan semakin aku termotivasi untuk mencari dan mencari jawapan serta makna.

Tetapi mengapa aku memiliki akal dan ke mana pergi ibu rusa ku?

(BERSAMBUNG)

20th SEPT 2016
SINAR HARIAN
XIFU NASER AL-MAJNUN

TAFSIR OF AL-AALAMIIN

TAFSIR OF 'AL-AALAMIIN'

الْقَوْلُ فِي تَأْوِيلِ قَوْلِهِ : ( الْعَالَمِينَ ) . 

قَالَهُ أَبُو جَعْفَرٍ : وَالْعَالَمُونَ جَمْعُ عَالَمٍ ، وَالْعَالَمُ : جَمْعٌ لَا وَاحِدَ لَهُ مِنْ لَفْظِهِ ، كَالْأَنَامِ وَالرَّهْطِ وَالْجَيْشِ ، وَنَحْوِ ذَلِكَ مِنَ الْأَسْمَاءِ الَّتِي هِيَ مَوْضُوعَاتٌ عَلَى جِمَاعٍ لَا وَاحِدَ لَهُ مِنْ لَفْظِهِ . 

وَالْعَالَمُ اسْمٌ لِأَصْنَافِ الْأُمَمِ ، وَكُلُّ صِنْفٍ مِنْهَا عَالَمٌ ، وَأَهْلُ كُلِّ قَرْنٍ مِنْ كُلِّ صِنْفٍ مِنْهَا عَالَمُ ذَلِكَ الْقَرْنِ وَذَلِكَ الزَّمَانِ . فَالْإِنْسُ عَالَمٌ ، وَكُلُّ أَهْلِ زَمَانٍ مِنْهُمْ عَالَمُ ذَلِكَ الزَّمَانِ . وَالْجِنُّ عَالَمٌ ، وَكَذَلِكَ سَائِرُ أَجْنَاسِ الْخَلْقِ ، كُلُّ جِنْسٍ مِنْهَا عَالَمُ زَمَانِهِ . وَلِذَلِكَ جُمِعَ فَقِيلَ : عَالَمُونَ ، وَوَاحِدُهُ جَمْعٌ ، لِكَوْنِ عَالَمِ كُلِّ زَمَانٍ مِنْ ذَلِكَ عَالَمَ ذَلِكَ الزَّمَانِ . وَمِنْ ذَلِكَ قَوْلُ الْعَجَّاجِ : 

فَخِنْدِفٌ هَامَةُ هَذَا الْعَالَمِ

فَجَعْلَهُمْ عَالَمَ زَمَانِهِ . وَهَذَا الْقَوْلُ الَّذِي قُلْنَاهُ ، قَوْلُ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ وَسَعِيدِ بْنِ جُبَيْرٍ ، وَهُوَ مَعْنَى قَوْلِ عَامَّةِ الْمُفَسِّرِينَ . [ ص: 144 ] 

156 - حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو كُرَيْبٍ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا عُثْمَانُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا بِشْرُ بْنُ عُمَارَةَ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو رَوْقٍ ، عَنِ الضِّحَّاكِ ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ : ( الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ ) الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ الَّذِي لَهُ الْخَلْقُ كُلُّهُ : السَّمَوَاتُ وَالْأَرَضُونَ وَمَنْ فِيهِنَّ ، وَمَا بَيْنَهُنَّ ، مِمَّا يُعْلَمُ وَلَا يُعْلَمُ . 

157 - وَحَدَّثَنِي مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ سِنَانٍ الْقَزَّازُ ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو عَاصِمٍ ، عَنْ شَبِيبٍ ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ : ( رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ ) : الْجِنُّ وَالْإِنْسُ . 

158 - حَدَّثَنِي عَلِيُّ بْنُ الْحَسَنِ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا مُسْلِمُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ مُصْعَبٍ ، عَنْ قَيْسِ بْنِ الرَّبِيعِ ، عَنْ عَطَاءِ بْنِ السَّائِبِ ، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ جُبَيْرٍ ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ، فِي قَوْلِ اللَّهِ جَلَّ وَعَزَّ ( رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ ) ، قَالَ : رَبِّ الْجِنِّ وَالْإِنْسِ . 

159 - حَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ إِسْحَاقَ بْنِ عِيسَى الْأَهْوَازِيُّ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو أَحْمَدَ الزُّبَيْرِيُّ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا قَيْسٌ ، عَنْ عَطَاءِ بْنِ السَّائِبِ ، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ جُبَيْرٍ : قَوْلُهُ : ( رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ ) ، قَالَ : الْجِنُّ وَالْإِنْسُ . [ ص: 145 ] 

160 - حَدَّثَنِي أَحْمَدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحِيمِ الْبَرْقِيُّ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنِي ابْنُ أَبِي مَرْيَمَ ، عَنِ ابْنِ لَهِيعَةَ ، عَنْ عَطَاءِ بْنِ دِينَارٍ ، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ جُبَيْرٍ ، قَوْلُهُ : ( رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ ) قَالَ : ابْنِ آدَمَ ، وَالْجِنِّ وَالْإِنْسِ ، كُلُّ أُمَّةٍ مِنْهُمْ عَالَمٌ عَلَى حِدَتِهِ . 

161 - حَدَّثَنِي مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ حُمَيْدٍ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا مِهْرَانُ ، عَنْ سُفْيَانَ ، عَنْ مُجَاهِدٍ : ( الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ ) ، قَالَ : الْإِنْسُ وَالْجِنُّ . 

162 - حَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ إِسْحَاقَ الْأَهْوَازِيُّ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو أَحْمَدَ الزُّبَيْرِيُّ ، عَنْ سُفْيَانَ ، عَنْ رَجُلٍ ، عَنْ مُجَاهِدٍ بِمَثَلِهِ . 

163 - حَدَّثَنَا بِشْرُ بْنُ مُعَاذٍ الْعَقَدِيُّ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا يَزِيدُ بْنُ زُرَيْعٍ ، عَنْ سَعِيدٍ ، عَنْ قَتَادَةَ : ( رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ ) قَالَ : كُلُّ صِنْفٍ عَالَمٌ . [ ص: 146 ] 

164 - حَدَّثَنِي أَحْمَدُ بْنُ حَازِمٍ الْغِفَارِيُّ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا عُبَيْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ مُوسَى ، عَنْ أَبِي جَعْفَرٍ ، عَنْ رَبِيعِ بْنِ أَنَسٍ ، عَنْ أَبِي الْعَالِيَةِ ، فِي قَوْلِهِ : ( رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ ) ، قَالَ : الْإِنْسُ عَالَمٌ ، وَالْجِنُّ عَالَمٌ ، وَمَا سِوَى ذَلِكَ ثَمَانِيَةَ عَشَرَ أَلْفِ عَالَمٍ ، أَوْ أَرْبَعَةَ عَشَرَ أَلْفِ عَالَمٍ - هُوَ يَشُكُّ - مِنَ الْمَلَائِكَةِ عَلَى الْأَرْضِ ، وَلِلْأَرْضِ أَرْبَعُ زَوَايَا ، فِي كُلِّ زَاوِيَةٍ ثَلَاثَةُ آلَافِ عَالَمٍ وَخَمْسُمِائَةِ عَالَمٍ ، خَلَقَهُمْ لِعِبَادَتِهِ . 

165 - حَدَّثَنَا الْقَاسِمُ بْنُ الْحَسَنِ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا الْحُسَيْنُ بْنُ دَاوُدَ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا حَجَّاجُ ، عَنِ ابْنِ جُرَيْجٍ ، فِي قَوْلِهِ : ( رَبِّ الَعَالَمِينَ ) قَالَ : الْجِنُّ وَالْإِنْسُ .

http://library.islamweb.net/newlibrary/display_book.php?bk_no=50&ID=&idfrom=19&idto=32&bookid=50&startno=2




ANOTHER POINT OF VIEW (UNKNOWN AUTHOR)

http://vb.tafsir.net/tafsir18485/

لقد غفل السادة المفسرون عند تناولهم لهذه الكلمة غفلة بسيطة, أدت إلى هذا التوسع في المعنى, على الرغم من أن الأمر من أوضح ما يكون!!

لا جدال في معنى كلمة عالم, فهذا مما يعرفه القاصي والداني, ولكن السؤال هو: ما هو جمعه؟

إن هذه الكلمة تُجمع على "عوالم", فإذا جُمعت على هذا الوزن كانت بالمعنى الذي ذكره المفسرون, ولكن الله تعالى لم يجمعها على عوالم, وإنما جمعها على "عالمون"

وكما نرى فإن الكلمة مما انتهت بالواو والنون, وهما لا يكونان في الجمع إلا مع العاقل! فيكون هذا دليلا على أن الحديث عن عوالم عاقلة! وبهذا يمكننا استبعاد الجمادات والدواب وكل ما عدا العاقل!

ولقد اخرج ابن عباس  كل ما عدا الإنس والجن بسبب آية الفرقان والتي سنعرض لها, فجعل العالمين هم الإنس والجن!

أما نحن فنقول:

العالمون هم الأمم أو الجماعات أو المجتمعات البشرية المختلفة.(في زمانٍ ما وليس مطلقا)

وليس للكلمة أي علاقة بالجن ولا الملائكة ولا الجمادات ولا الحيوانات ولا أي شيء ما عدا الإنسان!

ونبين من أين أتينا بهذا التحديد, فنقول:

ذُكرت كلمة "العالمين" 61 مرة في القرآن, جاءت في بعضها عامة, مما لا يمكن من تحديد المدلول المندرج تحتها, ولكنها أتت مخصصة في بعض المرات بأوصاف تحتم أن تكون بالمعنى الذي ذكرنا, ونتناول هذه الآيات:

يَا بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ اذْكُرُواْ نِعْمَتِيَ الَّتِي أَنْعَمْتُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَأَنِّي فَضَّلْتُكُمْ عَلَى الْعَالَمِينَ [البقرة : 47]

أيهما أولى أن نفهم أن بني إسرائيل فُضلوا على باقي المجتمعات في زمانهم, وبهذا لا تظهر إشكالية في وجود بعض الفسقة فيهم, لأنه تفضيل مجتمع على مجتمعات, أم من الأولى أن تُفهم أن بني إسرائيل فضلوا على كل الخلق؟!

وَإِذْ قَالَتِ الْمَلاَئِكَةُ يَا مَرْيَمُ إِنَّ اللّهَ اصْطَفَاكِ وَطَهَّرَكِ وَاصْطَفَاكِ عَلَى نِسَاء الْعَالَمِينَ [آل عمران : 42]

هنا نلاحظ أن العالمين لهم نساء! فهل لكل ما سوى الله نساء, أم أن النساء التي فُضلت مريم عليهن هن نساء المجتمعات البشرية في زمانها؟!

إِنَّ أَوَّلَ بَيْتٍ وُضِعَ لِلنَّاسِ لَلَّذِي بِبَكَّةَ مُبَارَكاً وَهُدًى لِّلْعَالَمِينَ [آل عمران : 96]

فِيهِ آيَاتٌ بَيِّـنَاتٌ مَّقَامُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَمَن دَخَلَهُ كَانَ آمِناً وَلِلّهِ عَلَى النَّاسِ حِجُّ الْبَيْتِ مَنِ اسْتَطَاعَ إِلَيْهِ سَبِيلاً وَمَن كَفَرَ فَإِنَّ الله غَنِيٌّ عَنِ الْعَالَمِينَ [آل عمران : 97]

فالبيت وضع للناس وهو هداية لكل المجتمعات والأمم, أم أن البيت هداية للدواب والسماوات والأرض والدواب؟!

كما نلحظ في الآية التالية أن من يكفر فإن الله غني عن العالمين, فأي المعنين أنسب, المجتمعات والأمم أم الكون بما فيه؟!

نعم, الله غني عن كل شيء, ولكن ما من مخلوق يكفر ويجحد إلا الإنسان!

وَإِذْ قَالَ مُوسَى لِقَوْمِهِ يَا قَوْمِ اذْكُرُواْ نِعْمَةَ اللّهِ عَلَيْكُمْ إِذْ جَعَلَ فِيكُمْ أَنبِيَاء وَجَعَلَكُم مُّلُوكاً وَآتَاكُم مَّا لَمْ يُؤْتِ أَحَداً مِّن الْعَالَمِينَ [المائدة : 20] 

ونلحظ هنا استعمال "أحد" والتي لا تُستعمل في القرآن إلا مع العاقل, وبغض النظر عن هذا, فإن الآية تقول أن الله أعطى بني إسرائيل ما لم يؤت أحد من العالمين, -وهذا غير بعثة الأنبياء فيهم وجعلهم ملوكا, لعطف الإتيان على هذين الأمرين, والعطف يقتضي المغايرة-

فإذا قبل بعض الأخوة أن يُفضل بنو إسرائيل على الملائكة, فهل يُعقل أن يعطى بنو إسرائيل ما لم تُعطه الملائكة ولا الشياطين؟!

أما على فهمنا وقولنا فلا إشكال!

قَالَ اللّهُ إِنِّي مُنَزِّلُهَا عَلَيْكُمْ فَمَن يَكْفُرْ بَعْدُ مِنكُمْ فَإِنِّي أُعَذِّبُهُ عَذَاباً لاَّ أُعَذِّبُهُ أَحَداً مِّنَ الْعَالَمِينَ [المائدة : 115]

العالمون يُعذبون, فهل يُعذب الجماد والنبات؟!

أُوْلَـئِكَ الَّذِينَ هَدَى اللّهُ فَبِهُدَاهُمُ اقْتَدِهْ قُل لاَّ أَسْأَلُكُمْ عَلَيْهِ أَجْراً إِنْ هُوَ إِلاَّ ذِكْرَى لِلْعَالَمِينَ [الأنعام : 90]

وَمَا تَسْأَلُهُمْ عَلَيْهِ مِنْ أَجْرٍ إِنْ هُوَ إِلاَّ ذِكْرٌ لِّلْعَالَمِينَ [يوسف : 104]

القرآن ذكرى وذكر للعالمين, فهل القرآن للجمادات والدواب, أم للجماعات والأمم المختلفة؟!

تَبَارَكَ الَّذِي نَزَّلَ الْفُرْقَانَ عَلَى عَبْدِهِ لِيَكُونَ لِلْعَالَمِينَ نَذِيراً [الفرقان : 1]

بهذه الآية استدل ابن عباس على أن المراد من العالمين هو الإنس والجن, لأن الرسول لم يكن إلا نذيرا لهما.

أما نحن فنقول أن المراد من العالمين هو المجتمعات البشرية فقط, ولا يدخل الجن فيها, لأن الجن والملائكة لا يسمون عالم, لأن العالم لا يكون إلا لمن له أثر ويُرى, وتذكر ما قاله الإمام الفخر الرازي:

"وهذا ضعيف لأن لفظ العالم مشتق من العلم وهو الدليل، فكل ما كان دليلاً على الله تعالى كان عالماً، فكان من العالم"

والعالم مشتق من العلم وهو ترك الأثر! ومن المعلوم أننا لا نرى لا الملائكة ولا الشياطين, ولا أثر مباشر لهم, لذا لا يُسمون عالم! فلا يدخلون في هذا المصطلح! كما أن الأوصاف المذكورة في حقهم تحتم أن يكونوا بشرا, مثل أن لهم نساء, ومثل الأوصاف القادمة. 

وَلُوطاً إِذْ قَالَ لِقَوْمِهِ أَتَأْتُونَ الْفَاحِشَةَ مَا سَبَقَكُم بِهَا مِنْ أَحَدٍ مِّن الْعَالَمِينَ [الأعراف : 80]

فهل كان لوط يحدثهم عن عدم فعل الحجر والطير أم البشر؟ وحتى لا يجادل بعضهم, نذكر له قوله تعالى:

أَتَأْتُونَ الذُّكْرَانَ مِنَ الْعَالَمِينَ [الشعراء : 165] 

فهذا دليل على أن المراد بالعالمين هم المجتمعات البشرية, ولقد الإمام الطبري عند تأويله هذه الآية:

"يعني بقوله أَتَأْتُونَ الذُّكْرَانَ مِنَ الْعَالَمِينَ ) : أتنكحون الذكران من بني آدم في أدبارهم." اهـ

وكذلك استعملها قومه بنفس المعنى:

قَالُوا أَوَلَمْ نَنْهَكَ عَنِ الْعَالَمِينَ [الحجر : 70]

فهم كانوا ينهونه عن مخاطبة أو التعامل مع الأجانب! والذين هم عالمون, لأنهم من مجتمعات أخرى!

وَالَّتِي أَحْصَنَتْ فَرْجَهَا فَنَفَخْنَا فِيهَا مِن رُّوحِنَا وَجَعَلْنَاهَا وَابْنَهَا آيَةً لِّلْعَالَمِينَ [الأنبياء : 91]

فَأَنجَيْنَاهُ وَأَصْحَابَ السَّفِينَةِ وَجَعَلْنَاهَا آيَةً لِّلْعَالَمِينَ [العنكبوت : 15]

فهل جُعلت مريم وسيدنا عيسى آية لجماعات البشر المختلفة أم للجمادات والحيوانات معهم, وللملائكة الذين باشروا العملية؟!

وكذلك هل جُعلت السفينة آية للمخلوقات كلها أم للبشر؟!

وَمِنَ النَّاسِ مَن يَقُولُ آمَنَّا بِاللَّهِ فَإِذَا أُوذِيَ فِي اللَّهِ جَعَلَ فِتْنَةَ النَّاسِ كَعَذَابِ اللَّهِ وَلَئِن جَاء نَصْرٌ مِّن رَّبِّكَ لَيَقُولُنَّ إِنَّا كُنَّا مَعَكُمْ أَوَلَيْسَ اللَّهُ بِأَعْلَمَ بِمَا فِي صُدُورِ الْعَالَمِينَ [العنكبوت : 10]

العالمون لهم صدور, والله يعلم بما فيها, فعلى أي المعنيين تنطبق؟!

ونختم بقوله تعالى:

فَلِلَّهِ الْحَمْدُ رَبِّ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَرَبِّ الْأَرْضِ رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ [الجاثية : 36]

فالله رب السماوات والأرض وهو رب العالمين, وهذا يعني أن العالمين شيء آخر غير السماوات والأرض!

ولقد قال الإمام الطبري عند تناوله هذه الآية:

"الطبري: ( رَبِّ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَرَبِّ الأرْضِ ) يقول: مالك السموات السبع، ومالك الأرضين السبع و( رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ ) يقول: مالك جميع ما فيهنّ من أصناف الخلق،" اهـ

أما نحن فنقول أنهم جماعات البشر فقط!

بهذا نكون قد بيّنا أن كلمة: عالمون, لا تستعمل إلا مع الأمم أو المجتمعات البشرية المختلفة, ولا تُستعمل مع غير هذا, لهذا خُتمت بالواو والنون, والله أعلى وأعلم.

والسلام عليكم ورحمة الله.

MY OWN:  rabbul 'aalamiin: the Lord of all rational free will generations